American Book Awards
1 appearances
-
Edition 43 (2022) Winner
スペンサー・アッカーマン
Spencer Ackerman
| Institution | Faculty | Department | Degree | Period | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bronx High School of Science | — | — | — | 1994–1998 | United States |
| Rutgers University | — | Philosophy | Bachelor of Arts | 1998–2002 | United States |
| Year | Award | Work | Category | Organization | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | National Magazine Award for Digital Media | Reporting on biased FBI training materials (published in Wired) | — | American Society of Magazine Editors (ASME) | 受賞 |
| 2014 | Pulitzer Prize for Public Service | 2013 global surveillance disclosures reporting (shared work at The Guardian) | — | The Pulitzer Prizes (as part of a team) | 共同受賞 |
| 2014 | Investigative Reporters and Editors (IRE) Medal | Investigative reporting on NSA surveillance (shared work at The Guardian) | — | Investigative Reporters and Editors | 共同受賞 |
| 2013 | Roy W. Howard Award for Public Service Reporting (Scripps Howard Foundation) | Reporting on surveillance disclosures (shared) | — | Scripps Howard Foundation | 共同受賞 |
| 2002 | Columbia Scholastic Press Association Certificate of Merit | News writing for The Daily Targum (coverage of Florida recount) | — | Columbia Scholastic Press Association | 受賞 |
A historical and critical examination of how the post-9/11 'War on Terror' reshaped American politics, security and justice, contributing to political outcomes in the 2010s, including the rise of Donald Trump. Tracks policy decisions, surveillance, interrogation practices and the expansion of domestic security measures.
Through national security investigative reporting, he exposed problematic FBI training materials and contributed to public understanding of NSA surveillance programs, prompting reviews and policy responses. His book and reporting have influenced contemporary US national security journalism.
If you can’t do it without sounding like Pat Buchanan, who has nothing but antipathy and contempt for Jews, then you’ve lost the debate.