World Literary Awards

← Back to awarded works
Lord of the Flies

Nobel Prize in Literature

Lord of the Flies

William Golding

William Golding's Lord of the Flies is an allegorical novel about boys stranded on an island who slide into disorder and violence.

allegorycivilizationviolenceisolation

Work Information

When the veneer of civilization peels away, human nature emerges.

The classic novel traces how an isolated group loses its rules and drifts toward domination and fear.

Book Information

Publisher
Penguin Publishing Group
Published
2003-12-16
Pages
224 pages
Language
英語
Size
10.6 x 1.5 x 19.1 cm
ISBN-13
9780399501487
ISBN-10
0399501487
Price
2481 JPY
Category
洋書/Politics & Social Sciences/Politics & Government/Specific Topics/Censorship

NOW A NETFLIX SERIES William Golding’s profound tale of stranded youth, survival, and the shadowy depths of human nature, with an afterword by Lois Lowry “ Lord of the Flies is one of my favorite books. I still read it every couple of years.”—Suzanne Collins, author of The Hunger Games trilogy At the dawn of the next World War, a plane crash strands a group of schoolboys on a remote island. There are no grownups. No rules. Freedom is celebrated. But when strange, distant noises and visions of a beast begin to haunt the boys, their fragile order unravels, and all hopes of rescue fade. Since 1954, William Golding’s Lord of the Flies has shaped our understanding of human nature—the latent darkness within, and the destructive or creative capacity of collective will. This edition also includes Suggestions for Further Exploration by Jennifer Buehler to contextualize Golding’s classic as one of the most timeless and socially relevant texts in the last century of literature.

William Golding was born in Cornwall, England, in 1911 and educated at Oxford University. His first book, Poems , was published in 1935. Following a stint in the Royal Navy during World War II, Golding wrote Lord of the Flies while teaching school. It was the first of several works, including the novels Pincher Martin , Free Fall , and The Inheritors and a play, The Brass Butterfly , which led to his being awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1983. Lois Lowry is the two-time Newbery Award–winning author of Number the Stars , The Giver Quartet , and numerous other books for young adults. Jennifer Buehler is an associate professor of educational studies at Saint Louis University and President of The Assembly on Literature for Adolescents of the National Council of Teachers of English.

Reviews

  • One of the best books to read to a middle schooler

    I read it in middle school, and I reread it out loud to my children during a family trip, as I have a middle schooler. Reading it as an adult, I like it even more, although I did recall the shock (and fascination) I felt as a kid as I read further into the book. As an adult, I am absolutely amazed at Golding's plot and story telling skills. I had a deep conversation with my daughter afterwards to discuss good vs evil, and why a lawless society is not healthy, safe, or ideal for anyone who wants to lead a good life. She was getting into a fight with her younger brother right after this deep conversation... So I went to her room, and asked her, are you acting like Jack? Or are you acting like Ralph? Which would you rather be? Ultimately, I told her that I hope she'll choose Ralph. I do hope that the deep and important message from the story actually sinks in, and help her better understand the consequences of evil and bad behavior - and lead her to seek cooperation and dignity with those around her. (I'm just a parent struggling with patenting, raising a pre-teen... Thank you all for reading my wishful thinking.)

  • やっぱり怖かった…

    昔、たまたま深夜に見た映画がメチャクチャ怖かったので原作も読んでみたくなりました。 この本の難易度を最近読んだ『プロジェクトヘイルメアリー』と比較すると、後者はうっすらとした宇宙物理学の知識(赤方偏移とか普通に出てきた)とビートルズネタが分かれば、英語そのものは特に捻りがなくザクザク読めますが、こちらは見たことも無い単語(flinkとか)があったり、聞いたことも無い表現(humming circleとか)が多かったり、ググっても正に『Lord of the Flies』での用例について質問しているフォーラムしかヒットしないとか、ゴールディングのオリジナルかもしれない表現もしばしば。ストーリーや人間関係そのものはシンプルなので飛ばしても問題ないかもしれませんが、精読派にはちょっとキツいかも。その他にも途中で急にSamnericなる知らん奴が出て来たので誰だと思って読み進めていくと、初めから出ていたSamとEricという双子の兄弟(Sam and Eric)の省略であることが何となく分かってきたりとかもありました(明言はされません。日本語版ではどうやって表現したんだろうか)。 更に分かりにくい要因は、直接的ではなく比喩的な表現の多いところです。 ラルフが何が正しいか分からなくなってしまうことを『頭の中でカーテンがはためく』と言ったり、悲惨なことのあった岩場に波しぶきがかかることを『死の岩に花開く』と言ったりですが、しかし考えてみると、この小説の怖い所は、正に少年たちの妄想と現実、やっていいこと悪いことの区別が曖昧になっていってしまうところにあるので、比喩表現によって現実を曖昧に語ることそのものに意味があるようにも思えます。島で発生する蜃気楼現象もその辺りに一役買ってます。Samnericのくだりも双子がいつの間にか1つの生き物のように少年たちの頭の中で変容してしまうということの表現かも知れません(好意的にとれば…)。 『夏への扉』みたいに、精読すると逆に味が薄れてしまうような作品もありますが、この作品はストーリーを知っていて、じっくり精読してもなお、ラストに向かって心をギュッと掴まれますので、大変かもしれませんがしっかり読むことをお勧めします。 でも、最後まで本名の分からないピギーって、マジでかわいそうだよな…

  • 十五少年漂流記のパロディー

    ううう 子供のころに読んだ「十五少年漂流記」の悪質なパロディーです 少年は純真で優しいという常識を覆しました 無人島に着いた少年たちが互いに殺しあうという内容は ショッキングでした この作品が描く世界があまりにも生々しいのです ゆえに危険だと思いました

  • BEST

    BEST

  • 考えさせられる作品

    非常に奥深さを感じる作品。子供達の視点ながら、大人社会に通じる、集団心理、人間の非情さを感じた。

  • Not the best quality

    The pages it self are cheap quality and not very nice to read. The book is fantastic

  • Unwavering , beautiful

    This is the kind of book that makes you stay at home and get doctrine and entertainment at a same time . Golding's prudent usage of allegories and metaphors will act as conveyance of revelation ; a revelation of the darkest side of the human being under the anarchic decree . This great literary work will bring you the realization that fear is crouching inside everyone's deepest soul and ,it can blind the humanly decision and blackout the civilized decorum in a very blink of the eye . I strongly recommend to read the book and peruse it if you already had . Don't bother your curiosity by glimpsing the movie , which adapted from the novel .

  • ジャック・メリデュー

    20年ほど前に、卒論にこれを選ぶか、「指輪物語」を選ぶか、 結局後者を選んだのですが、そのくらい毎日読んでいるという 状態に近い小説です。 中でも、主人公ラーフに対立するジャック・メリデューがいい。 ラーフは、最後に「失われた無垢」と表現されている通りに、 冒頭では如何に無垢な「ただの子供」であるかが描かれているのに、 ジャックは最初っから明らかにそうではない少年として 描かれています。 この作品とヴェルヌの「十五少年漂流記」をよく比較されますが、 あちらも確かにブリアンとドニファンがやたら対立したり、 無人島に到着したり、とシチュエーションは多々似ていますが、 あちらはモノが多すぎます、あれなら誰でもまともに暮らせます。 (さらに、湖が凍っているのにも関わらず熊2頭に襲われかける、 とか、ちょっと「それはどうなの?」という展開もあるので、 ある意味ファンタジックな物語で、最後はきっと「めでたしめでたし」で 終わるんだろうな、という予感は最初っから漂っておりますが) ここでは、文明の利器と呼べるものは、ナイフとそして、 ピギーのメガネだけです。 ブリアン達とは違い、それだけしか、ありません。 そして、実際、良家のお坊ちゃんたちと言えども、たかが12歳くらいの 少年たち、実際に大人がいない無人島に集められたらどうなるか。 「十五少年」のような規律正しい生活(さらに銃の扱いにも やたら慣れてる)は送れない、と思います。 その意味で、「本当は子供って残酷なんだぜ」という事実を ラーフとジャックの対立で見事に描いていると思うのですが。 そして、どっちにつくか、ふらふらと揺れる子供達。 大人でいようと最後まで努力し続けたピギー。 誰よりも大人であったかもしれないサイモン。 最後の最後で、ジャックが一歩踏み出しつつも何も言えなかった、 それが全てだと思います。 他の作品と比較するのは、野暮じゃないのかな、と思える話です。 ちなみに、映画にもなりましたが見てはいけません。 間違っても、間違っても見てはいけませんとそれだけは言っておきます。 90分間、ひたっすらブーイングの嵐ですので…(しかも座ってられない)。 ジャックが、ラーフに今一つ劣等感を感じてたのは、 ルックスのせいもあったんじゃないかな、と密かに思っています。 ヴェルヌを読んで、改めて読み進めてみると、ここに出て来る少年達が いかに現実的か、ということが、よく判ります。 お勧めはしませんが、好きでたまらない小説の一つであることに間違いはありません。

  • A tragedy written with love and empathy

    Someone said, a tragedy is a story where you can comprehend every step of the protagonists and foresee their final falling down the cliff, but cannot hinder it. When Mr. Golding worked on this story, seemingly he had such a tragedy in mind. Before I read this story, I have already heard a lot about it, about the evil in human nature, dystopia, etc, which made me even more surprised to see with how much love and empathy Mr. Golding proceeded with the story telling. In this story, no one is perfect, but everyone carries some virtue with him. Even Jack, who ended up as the barbaric despotic leader, started as someone aiming to contribute to the commons, just like every other boy in this story. The boys also have learnt the first democratic rules, such as voting, assembly, and speaking only when the conch is in his hands. It is interesting how Mr. Golding distributed different virtues among the children. Piggy, the one who is best capable of rational reasoning, is fat and lazy. Simon, the one who is best capable of empathy and the only one who could have helped the children to get relieved from their fear, is incapable of good speaking and regarded as batty. He died first, killed by those he liked, thus not able to relieve the children from their fear, which contributed to their drifting to the cruelty. Ralph is the one with the most leadership quality and also chosen as the leader at the beginning. He is no idealized hero who unites all virtues in himself, in fact, there is no such hero in this story, everyone has some drawbacks, has also a lovable side, just like in the real life. Jack is the charismatic challenger. He has hardly any empathy, but he is motivated by doing things he deems as right. In fact, most children in this story think he is right, namely you have to sort the people from good to bad and treat them accordingly. Jack accepted Ralph as the leader because Ralph is good: physically strong, speaks fluently, ready to take the responsibilities. He started to hate Ralph because Ralph is unjust from his point of view: Ralph even listens to Piggy, the fatty boy who is mocked by almost everyone, while his effort to do good for the commons, namely to get meat for the children, is not appreciated. BTW, there is a reason why Ralph has something against getting meat, but you have to read it on your own. IMHO, this is actually a story for adults, not only for children. While no adult would make silly things like being scared of a dead body and mistaking it for a beast, almost all adults must understand the ominous murmuring “the beast is in us”. Look at that dispute between getting meat and keeping fire, look at that killing in frenzy, look at that attempt of denial and avoidance after the first murder, doesn’t it look familiar to you? It seems to me that Mr. Golding is trying to reconstruct the fallbacks during the transition from barbarism to civilization, but I should not say too much, because the most fun of reading is to form ones own opinions. As Ralph keeps saying to himself in this story when he is in danger, “think”. Keep thinking even if you are past 18.

  • Buen libro

    Lo compré de segunda mano. Vino en perfecto estado excepto algunas anotaciones a lápiz que fueron fácilmente eliminables con una goma. El libro en sí es una gran lectura. Historia tensa llena de analogías con la vida real y simbolismos que llevan a posarse preguntas desde el ambito político hasta el antropológico. No es un libro infantil o juvenil. Recomiendo su lectura a alguien que quiera leer un libro más serio.

  • Thanks

    Nice book and excellent edition. I really enjoyed it. Thanks

  • As expected and advertised

    As expected and advertised

  • Amazing book

    The book was an exercise for the mind, the vocab is way too advanced and made me search for the meaning of every word, got me tired but also taught me many new words. Excellent book but the advanced vocab got me way too tired.

Related Literary Awards