World Literary Awards

← Back to awarded works
The Man in the High Castle

Hugo Award

The Man in the High Castle

Philip K. Dick

A science-fiction novel set in a world where the Axis powers won the war. The boundary between reality and fiction is further unsettled by the novel-within-the-novel structure.

alternate historycounterfactualoccupationfictionscience fiction

Work Information

If history had turned out differently, our reality would wear another face.

One of Philip K. Dick’s signature alternate-history novels, it layers occupied America with an unstable sense of reality. Its unease works quietly but deeply.

Book Information

Publisher
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Published
2016-10-18
Pages
288 pages
Language
英語
Size
13.97 x 2.54 x 20.96 cm
ISBN-13
9780544916081
ISBN-10
0544916085
Price
3144 JPY
Category
洋書/Science Fiction & Fantasy/Science Fiction

“The single most resonant and carefully imagined book of Dick’s career.” — New York Times It’s America in 1962. Slavery is legal once again. The few Jews who still survive hide under assumed names. In San Francisco, the I Ching is as common as the Yellow Pages. All because some twenty years earlier the United States lost a war—and is now occupied by Nazi Germany and Japan. This harrowing, Hugo Award–winning novel is the work that established Philip K. Dick as an innovator in science fiction while breaking the barrier between science fiction and the serious novel of ideas. In it Dick offers a haunting vision of history as a nightmare from which it may just be possible to wake. Winner of the Hugo Award

Over a writing career that spanned three decades, PHILIP K. DICK (1928–1982) published 36 science-fiction novels and 121 short stories in which he explored the essence of what makes us human and the dangers of centralized power. Toward the end of his life, his work turned to deeply personal, metaphysical questions concerning the nature of God. Eleven novels and short stories have been adapted to film, notably, Blade Runner (based on Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? ), Total Recall , Minority Report , and A Scanner Darkly . The recipient of critical acclaim and numerous awards throughout his career, Dick was inducted into the Science Fiction Hall of Fame in 2005, and in 2007 the Library of America published a selection of his novels in three volumes. His work has been translated into twenty-five languages.

Reviews

  • H

    What he wanted say in this novel is the I Ching the book of holy divine from Dao which is believed that the rule of universe is how you lead your disteny. I myself is one of them . Iam 73years old Japanese woman knows nothing about Philip Dick at all .I haven't seen SF movie, how do I know ? I believe Dao bring me to read this novel. I am a fortune teller using I Ching. I think very few Japanese I Ching user knows his name.

  • 【追記有】日本側の描写にちょっと首をかしげる部分が多いがなかなかの力作、海外アマゾンではドラマ版が公開され大ヒットを記録しています

    『ブレードランナー』『マイノリティリポート』『トータルリコール』の原作者による、第二次大戦に枢軸国側が勝利したパラレルワールドの1960年代北米を舞台にした小説です。 2015年にアマゾンプライム限定ドラマとしてアメリカ、イギリスで公開され、大変なヒットとなり、セカンドシーズンの制作も発表された作品でもあります。 (その後ファーストシーズンはドイツ語吹き替え/字幕版も作成され、ドイツでも公開されました。) 帝国日本の傀儡の西アメリカ、ナチスドイツの傀儡の東アメリカ、その間に位置する中立地帯の3つの地域に分断されたかつての「アメリカ合衆国」。 その世界において、"The man in the high castle"(高い城の男)と呼ばれる謎の小説家の手による、連合国側が勝利したパラレルワールドを描く小説がヒットしていて、その作中小説の本文が、本来の本文に引用されている部分がかなりある(実はこの作中小説で描かれる世界は史実とちょっと違うというのもまたポイント)という、何とも不思議な入れ子構造の世界観。 当然アメリカ人だけでなく日独側の人物も描かれるのですが、日本やその傀儡の西アメリカの描写には日本人としては若干首をかしげるところがみられます。 逆に、ドイツ人から見たらドイツや東アメリカの描写にも違和感があるのかもしれません。 「輪タク(ペディキャブ)」が日常の足であり、「易経(イーチン、あの易者が占って、「当たるも八卦当たらぬも八卦」のアレです)」が行動指針の大きなポイントとなっていて、「道(タオ)」がどうの、「无(ウー)」がどうの、という言葉を常々口にする日本人や西アメリカ人たち。 ”Nobusuke Tagomi"やら”Betty Kasoura"なるおかしな名前の日本人。 翻訳版では「田上信輔」「ベティ梶浦」等に直されていますが、英語版を読むとまずこの辺がひっかかってきます。 逆に、”Baron L. B. Kaelemakule"はネイティブハワイアン系の人物なんでしょうけれど、翻訳版では「鎌倉男爵」になっているのもわけがわからない。 21世紀の普通の日本人には、多分「易経」だの「道」だのなんて、何の知識も持ち合わせていないですよね? 少なくとも私は全然わかりません。 この辺が、英語版を読み進めるうえでかなりわかりにくい部分でした。 日本語版を読んでも正直よくわかんないんですもんw かなりグーグル先生のお世話になりましたw まあドイツが勝ってる世界なので英語の平文に混ざってドイツ語の単語もいっぱい出てきて、それもまたドイツ語の知識がなくて全然わからなくてグーグルで検索したのですが。 ですが、やはり訳者の手を通して洗練されてしまった文章を読むのとは違う手ごたえを確かに感じました。 音韻の踏み方や、英語的表現と日本語的表現の差という部分、この辺はやはり原語版ならではの味わいがあります。 数々の映像化作品をもつディック氏の実力というものが、伝わってくる気がします。 是非とも、日本語版を読んだ後に、あるいはドラマ版を視聴した後に、挑戦してもらいたい一冊です。 なお、ドラマ版は、『新世紀エヴァンゲリオン』と『ヱヴァンゲリヲン新劇場版』くらいこの小説と違う感じですのでお気を付け下さい。 ドラマのキーパーソンなのに小説には存在しない人もいますし、同じ人物、同じ世界観でも全然違う方向に歯車がかみ合ってきます。 【2016年12月22日追記】 日本アマゾンでもドラマ版の字幕/吹き替えバージョンが公開になりましたね! 日本では物議を醸しそうなシーンがあり、公開できるのか不安でしたが、ちょっとカットしたりなんだりで公開してくれたのは日本アマゾンの英断だと思います。 是非ドラマ版と一緒にこの本もお楽しみください。

  • 相当変な小説

    相当変な小説です。最後まで読んでも、謎は解決されず、フラストレーションがたまります。真の主人公は易経でした。普通の意味のSFではありません また小説中の(日本とドイツの敗北した世界を描く)Grasshopper Lies Heavy が、史実とは違うのも謎です。深読みすると僕らの生きているこの世界も実在しない架空の世界だとディックは言いたいのでしょうか?

  • Not my cup of tea

    This book, along with a scanner darkly, ended a run of sci-fi reading that I was really quite enjoying. It could very well have been fatigue, but I found this book trying. The man wrote too much. This is not to say you cannot enjoy the book for it's premise, but this is the limit. Thank Pil.

  • This really hasn't aged well

    I'm a big fan of Philip K Dick, but this book feels like one of the ones he wrote when he was high. I can see that, by the standards of the day, his portrayal of the Japanese character was acceptable or even pretty progressive. But by today's standards it seems a crude and ill-informed caricature. I know we aren't supposed to judge literature by modern standards, but this wasn't written in the nineteenth century.

  • 私が悪いのです

    初めての作者との出会いを求めて、NYT紙のベストセラーにランクインしていた本作を購入。 結果は内容自体がよく理解出来ず、惨敗でした。勿論作品ではなく、私が悪いのだと断言しておきます。 ご参考までに、私の「敗因」を挙げておきます。 ①単語使いが独特で、見慣れない単語が多い ②文章の変な省略が多い ③構文の順番を逆にする(倒置法?)ことや中途半端に長い挿入がやたら多い ④登場人物のキャラやストーリーの進展について繰り返し説明することがほぼ無く、一度見落とすとリカバリー出来ない 英語に相当自信がある方を除いて、お奨めしません。

  • 歴史改変物、楚々とした妙な日常!??

    賞をもらってるくらいの名作!?のはずだが作者は時々思考がハイ(混濁か)、時に意味不明。昔途中で投げ出して、今回再挑戦した次第。話はまずまず:独・日支配下の様々な諸相、古物・骨董商の物語、戦前からの党と国軍との対立を引きずるドイツ、潜伏ユダヤ人の運命、反政府小説家の暗殺を巡る事件などが描かれるが、バラバラで収束するわけではないので、最後は少し唖然、これでお仕舞!?ナチスに詳しければ死んだはずの人物が沢山出てくるので楽しめる!!!英語は我慢やね。辞書なんか繰らない方が良し。鼻から分かるような英語を使っていない!!

  • アマゾンドラマを見たあとなので

    どうしても映像化されたものが常に頭をよぎって、あまりの違いように唖然でした。特にジュリアナのキャラが違いすぎるし(ドラマと違い、ちゃらい自己中30女)扱いも脇役です。原作の主役は田上(タゴミと表記されている)のようで、チルダンの扱いも大きいが、ドラマで準主役級の憲兵隊の木戸は存在しない。日本人の名前は皆奇妙なのもストレス。ドラマと違い、パラレルワールドが主題ではありませんでした。モヤモヤするので訳本も買って読んでみます。

  • Ok

    Libro molto bello, la trama del libro non ha niente a che vedere col film (x chi vuole leggere il libro prima del film).

  • Intelligent, thought-provoking book ... just adjust your expectations from the TV series

    I enjoy science fiction and Philip K. Dick ... I'd been meaning to read The Man in the High Castle for a while, and with the Amazon TV series based on the novel coming out I thought it would be a nice chance to finally read it. I read the book pretty much at the same time as I watched the TV shows ... to the point of occasionally getting confused when trying to recall whether a particular event happened in the book or in the TV series--the shows are only very loosely tied to the book, but some of the nitty-gritty details are oddly similar even though many of the big picture issues are not. I figure that many people coming to this book now are doing so with only the TV shows as a reference, and might not have read PKD before, so I thought I'd write this review with that in mind. Perhaps the first thing to be aware of is that the novel is leisurely and relatively free of dramatic action. The main "action" occurs between the characters' ears--it is the inner monologues and terse dialogues where most of the action occurs. Despite often being held up as an exemplar of the genre of alternate history, I'd even go so far as to say that the novel isn't even really a "thought exercise" in the sense of exploring answers to the question of: "If the Axis powers won the war, what would things be like?" I'd argue that this is where the TV series shines--imagining such an alternate reality and setting characters loose in such a setting, with attending assassinations and intrigues. This is not to say that PKD is not interested in such issues, and he has well thought-out detail as to how the Allied powers could have lost, and what the dynamics in the upper echelons of US and German politics would've been before, during, and after the war. But to focus on questions like "I wonder what Japanese-occupied San Francisco would be like?" would only be a superficial reading of what PKD wants the reader to think about--the setting is the vehicle, not the destination. Dick's interests lie in broader and more universal issues like "What is reality?" "What is authenticity?" "What does it mean to be human, and what is humanity?" These are themes that repeat themselves over and over in his works, and as a result his books are best savored rather than rushed through just to find out "what happens next". As a result, Dick's works (such as this one) are more philosophy than they are suspense and adventure. There is action, but Dick is more interested in meaning, motivation, and aftermath than pure cause and effect. There are answers, but they are often ambiguous and open to interpretation, like the lines in the I Ching. And, as such, this book will not speak to everyone--I imagine some fans of the TV show might not like the book, and vice versa. Personally, I like them both, but for different reasons--the book is perhaps the yin to the TV show's yang. That said, I wish the TV show had a little more of the book's philosophizing, and as a reader I wouldn't mind if the book had a little more of the TV show's action and exploration of the alternate history setting. What I would hope, though, is that fans of the TV show who are skeptical of the book give it a chance, just like Tagomi and the piece of Edfrank jewelry he contemplates first with no expectations, despair, and only a small, blind grasping at hope ... the hope that perhaps it *will* speak to him, transform him, and sure enough, without even realizing it ... it does.

  • Great read

    A genius

  • Muy buena edición

    Una historia que te atrapa, fascinante. La edición de pasta blanda es muy buena. Toma en cuenta que el libro viene en inglés.

  • Wonderful

    Wow, the book is really good as you can in see in Goodreads but, the review is about the condition of book. It's paperback but, lot that deter you from buying this as this paperback so far survived a coffee & pepsi. Really like it

Related Literary Awards